Recent Action in the Dow Jones (and AP) Motion to unseal the papers that represent Fitzgerald's affidavits and the presently redacted opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, in what I refer to as the "Miller and Cooper Must Testify" case -- a case that was conducted as a prelude to the Libby indictment.
2/9/07 PER CURIAM ORDER filed  denying motion to unseal without prejudice to the refiling upon completion of the proceedings in US v. Libby, No. 05-cr-00394 (D.C.D.C.) [1012356-1] Before Judges Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel. [Entry Date: 2/9/07] [04-3138, 04-3139, 04-3140] (mcm) [04-3138 04-3139 04-3140]
This is in agreement with the government's request to deny the Motion to Unseal -- or hold it in abeyance until the Libby case is concluded. The Court's denial of the Motion "without prejudice" means that the same or similar Motion can be filed after Libby's criminal trial is concluded.
From the previous filings, I infer that the government will supply the Circuit Court of Appeals with a list of elements in the affidavits and currently redacted opinion that can now be published, where the selection is supported by the court record in the Libby trial.
March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 March 2009 April 2009